The NBA just isn't the same with out the Supersonics

As the NBA season gets underway, most would think of how the Miami Heat will do with the additions of LeBron James and Chris Bosh, who are both joining perennial All-Star Dwyane Wade. Or talk about the possibility the Los Angeles Lakers will win their third straight NBA championship (which would also be their second three-peat under coach Phil Jackson). Or if 2010-11 will be the final hurrah for Shaq.

But I'm not going to talk about those topics above. Today, it's tough for me to watch the NBA these days for one particular reason: the Seattle Supersonics are no longer there, and what pisses me off about that the most is the way they were heartlessly taken away from a city that embraced the team so well for 41 years. A team that had countless stars like Dennis Johnson, Jack Sikma, "Downtown" Freddy Brown, Shawn Kemp, and Gary Payton. A pair of noted coaches in Lenny Wilkens and George Karl. And a team that has the city's only major league championship, winning the 1979 NBA title--and that very trophy is still in Seattle as it sits at the Seattle Museum of History and Industry.

In 2006, Howard Schultz sold the team to Clay Bennett, a businessman based out of Oklahoma City that temporarily housed the New Orleans Hornets after that team was displaced because of Hurricane Katrina. During the press conference introducing Bennett as the team's new owner, he promised that the team would stay in Seattle. Now this is where my hatred of Bennett, Schultz, and NBA commissioner David Stern begins.

In that same press conference, Bennett showed anyone that rooted for the green and gold of the Supersonics how much of a two-faced liar he was. It was clear what Bennett's intentions were upon gaining control of the team from Schultz. He wanted to move the team to Oklahoma City as soon as he possibly could, and--when his ownership group agreed to a deal with the city of Seattle about the team's lease with Key Arena--he succeeded in doing so. The team would be renamed the Thunder and began play with the 2008-09 season.

Next up is David Stern. He continually slammed Seattle politicians because he thought they weren't doing enough to either fund a new arena or fund a potential renovation of Key Arena. At the time of the Supersonics' last year in Seattle, Key Arena had a seating capacity of 17,000, which was too small by Stern's standards. And Stern made it radically clear that if the Supersonics left town, Seattle would never have a team again. Stern essentially slapped the city right in the face with that comment, and I cannot wait for the day when he is no longer the league's commissioner.

For all I care, all three of these men can go to hell for their roles in the loss of the Pacific Northwest's first modern and original pro sports team. And because of that, I will never root for the Oklahoma City Thunder or set foot in a Starbucks as long as I live. Stern and Bennett never apologized to the fans in Seattle for their cowardice, and if they ever do down the road, they won't be getting any forgiveness from me. Schultz apologized to the fans for allowing the sale to happen in the first place, but that isn't enough either.

And before I finish this entry, I'd like to give "Sonicsgate: Requiem for a Team" a plug here. It's a documentary film about the rise and fall of the Supersonics, and the lingering anger that remains from its fans in Seattle after the team was heartlessly moved out of town. I've seen the movie in its entirety and I thought the producers and the writers of the film did an excellent job in not just keeping the memory of the Supersonics alive, but also went did an excellent job in going in-depth into the more scandalous reasons behind the loss of the team. If you haven't seen it yet, you should because you won't regret watching it.

Oregon and Boise State not 1-2 in first BCS rankings is a joke

When the college football polls were released on Sunday, it was no secret the #1 team in the first BCS standings of the 2010 season should have been either the Oregon Ducks or the Boise State Broncos. But when the poll was released, we were in for quite the surprise from the BCS computer. Their #1 team?: the Oklahoma Sooners. That's right--the Sooners (ranked third in the AP, Harris, and ESPN/USA Today Coaches' poll) got the nod to be on top of the first BCS rankings of the season. What hurts both Oregon and Boise State is their respective strength of schedules. The Broncos especially, because they're in their final season in the WAC and their strength of schedule is the weakest of the bunch. Sure, their non-conference wins over Virginia Tech and Oregon State are nice, but because they're in the WAC, those wins still aren't good enough. If Virginia Tech had been able to beat James Madison (a reasonably good FCS school) in Blacksburg, Boise State's ranking in the initial poll would have been a little higher, but no higher than second once the BCS came out. Even though they blew out lowly conference foe San Jose State 48-0, it actually hurt them in the rankings because of how bad the Spartans' record is.

On the subject of the Ducks, Oregon is in the Pac-10 (will be the Pac-12 once Utah and Colorado officially join the conference in 2011 and 2012, respectively) and the champion in that league always gets an automatic bid to the Rose Bowl (that is if the Ducks don't finish 1st or 2nd in the final BCS rankings). I'm sure their fans are crying foul over the rankings much like Boise State fans are, given the fact that Oregon is #1 in the AP, Harris, and ESPN/USA Today Coaches' polls. And quite frankly, I think Oregon should be #1 in the BCS and Boise State #2. But that damned BCS computer did not put the Ducks topping all the polls into consideration when the fresh batch of rankings was released.

Which now brings me to the Sooners. They're playing at Missouri, another unbeaten Big 12 team that's in the BCS rankings (ranked 11th to be exact; Oklahoma State is the other Big 12 team in the standings, ranked 14th and unbeaten like Oklahoma and Missouri). On top of that Oklahoma also has wins over Florida State, Air Force, and perennial rival Texas. And should the Sooners beat the Tigers on Saturday, it would give them a big cushion when the next set of rankings are released next week, regardless of what Oregon does against UCLA on Thursday night or what Boise State does against Louisiana Tech next Tuesday. I guess it's safe to say that a lot of Oregon and Boise State fans are going to cheering hard for the Missouri Tigers to upset the Sooners this weekend in Columbia, because if the Tigers can make that happen, it could blow the BCS wide open, and permit the two best teams in college football to occupy the top two spots when the new rankings are released, right where they should be.

Baseball's managerial carousel and my thoughts on Eric Wedge

As the first games of the League Championship Series prepare to get underway, six big league teams have managerial openings, and one has already been filled. Not long after the Atlanta Braves season ended (along with the Bobby Cox era), the team wasted no time in locking up Fredi Gonzalez. Teams also looking for managers are the Pittsburgh Pirates, Chicago Cubs, Florida Marlins, and New York Mets. But before I discuss the Mariners' role in the carousel (which will likely end early next week) I just want to say that I enjoyed Bobby Cox during his time as the Braves skipper. Even though the guy always found a way to get kicked out of a game (he has a major league record 161 ejections, three of which were in the postseason), he also found ways to lead the Braves to 14 straight division titles (1991-1993, 1995-2005), including a World Series victory in 1995 and four more during the 1990s.

Now it looks like the Seattle Mariners are on the brink of becoming the second team this offseason to hire a new manager, and according to sources, almost all signs point to the team hiring former Cleveland Indians manager Eric Wedge. The team also looked at Bobby Valentine (former manager of the Rangers, Mets, and Japanese league Chiba Lotte Marines), John Gibbons (former Blue Jays manager and a native of Great Falls), Cecil Cooper (managed the Houston Astros for parts of two seasons), and Lloyd McClendon (managed the Pirates for four mediocre years). When Wedge was managing the Indians, the team came within one victory of winning the American League pennant in 2007 only to cough up a 3-1 series lead to eventual World Series champion Boston. Cleveland almost made the postseason in 2005 but they finished two games behind--you guessed it--the Red Sox (who also finished tied for first in the AL East with the Yankees, but the Yankees won the division title via a tiebreaker based on head-to-head record).

As a whole, I thought Wedge did a great job during his time managing the Indians, and had they won the AL pennant in 2007, the Indians might have had the potential to win their first World Series since winning it all in 1948. He's everything that previous Mariners manager Don Wakamatsu was not: fiery, intense, and very passionate about his job and profession. His attitude will wear off on his players, especially the younger players because many of the players he managed in Cleveland were up-and-coming stars, which included guys like CC Sabathia, Cliff Lee, Grady Sizemore, and Victor Martinez. The Mariners are making a very wise move by bringing in a no-nonsense guy like Wedge. Given the fact the Mariners just came off a 101-loss season, getting the team back to a level where they can win 85-95 games in future seasons is going to take some time just like it did when Wedge was in Cleveland. But I know that Wedge will do a great job in Seattle and will guide the Mariners to the postseason at some point down the road.

It's the Canucks' time in 2010-11

For the past two years, the Vancouver Canucks have been knocking on the door as a major power in the NHL's Western Conference. Now it appears they're ready to blow the door off in 2010-11 because of an array of moves that not only bolstered their defensive corps, but also a change in team captain.

Goaltender Roberto Luongo surrendered the captaincy of the team for the 2010-11 season after serving as the team's captain the last two seasons. I'm glad Luongo decided to do this because he no longer has this burden to carry on his shoulders and will simply allow him to focus on guarding the goal crease. He's one of the best goaltenders in the NHL and I think now's the time for him to backstop the Canucks to a championship.

In regards to the blueline, the team added Dan Hamhuis (a native of British Columbia that signed with the team as a free agent and was interested in playing in his home province) and Keith Ballard (who was traded to Vancouver from the Florida Panthers). This was an Achilles' heel for the Canucks when they advanced to the second round of the playoffs last season. Their lack of depth on defense during their six-game playoff series loss to the eventual Stanley Cup champion Chicago Blackhawks showed, and the Blackhawks wasted no time on pouncing on them anytime and anywhere. The two big additions as well as the other returning defensmen (Andrew Alberts, Kevin Bieksa, Alex Edler, Christian Ehrhoff, and Aaron Rome) will have to step their game for the first few months of the season because veteran defenseman Sami Salo won't be ready until the calendar turns to 2011 at the earliest, as he ruptured an Achilles tendon during the offseason while he was playing a game of floorball. Even without Salo and his explosive slapshot, I see the defensive corps performing better this season.

And finally, to the forwards. The Sedin twins are back, of course with Henrik Sedin coming off an MVP season in 2009-10 and Daniel Sedin who I hope will stay healthy this season. Also back is two-way center Ryan Kesler and top 6 forwards Mikael Samuelsson and Mason Raymond. But one player that I'm concerned about is Alex Burrows, who underwent shoulder surgery in the offseason and his return is uncertain. Even though he draws the ire of almost anyone on the ice, he knows how put the puck in the back of the net. The free agent signings of Manny Malhotra and Raffi Torres should make up for the loss of Burrows, but the "pain in the butt" mentality possessed by Burrows will be missed on the ice. I expect the Sedin twins and whoever lines up with them to have a great season.

But now it's on to why I believe it's the Canucks' time. This is probably the best team they've had to start the season since after the NHL lockout (which wiped out the 2004-05 season). Even ESPN hockey analyst Barry Melrose thinks the Canucks will win the Stanley Cup this year, and I tend to agree with him on that front. Vancouver has the talent, the goal-scoring, goaltending, defense, and all the intangibles to win the team's first Stanley Cup in franchise history. And should the Canucks accomplish that, they would also become the first Canadian team to raise Lord Stanley's mug since Montreal raised it for the 24th time in their famed history in 1993.

And speaking of those 1993 Montreal Canadiens, here's a couple of clips from their Stanley Cup run: